frequently you listen that we are ruled by way of laws – no longer by guys. that means the legal guidelines are just and protect our liberty, whereas guys (and girls) rule whilst possibility arises to their own pastimes with disbenefit to others. but, of direction, laws are continually created and changed by men and women to serve their pursuits. So, awful legal guidelines which can tyrannize some human beings are to be anticipated.Then, whilst is the ‘rule of law’ promoting liberty and not fostering tyranny? It does so whilst it secures our unalienable rights thru courtroom strategies that maintain them for each people.the freedom that we are seeking is absolutely liberty. Liberty is freedom constrained and preserved via law. It guarantees our unalienable rights (our liberties) that are self-evident ‘rights’ embedded within the psyche of man. They rise up from his nature and are unchanging.the united states’s assertion of Independence founded the U.S. as a government whose purpose is to at ease the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and happiness for each of us. these include one’s proper to self-dedication, to very own belongings, to discern his toddler, to pursue whatever profession or organization he desires, among others.The legal guidelines which a rustic devises are man-made legal guidelines so they’re challenge to the whims, interests, and mistakes of those that shape the legal guidelines and the regulations by using which they’re executed. true legal guidelines are those that comfy the unalienable rights for every folks. but the strength of special hobby corporations can often pervert legal guidelines jeopardizing or denying rights of some.bad laws have been predicted through our founding fathers who had been tyrannized by means of England’s remedy of them as colonials. in addition they identified that laws deteriorate over time as special hobby agencies grow an excessive amount of in influence and control inside governmental affairs.seeking to guarantee our rights in opposition to the authorities, the founding fathers created the bill of Rights (now complemented by way of in addition amendments) which presupposed to specific some of our rights and restrict authorities infringement of them. Such rights aren’t problem to be voted down; they may be to be secured most effective. They make us a republic and not a natural democracy problem to tyrannical factions.We each confront the legal guidelines of our land while we visit courtroom both as a defendant against the kingdom or as a litigant in a civil suit. So courts are where the ‘rubber meets the road’ – i.e. in which you find out if your authorities is securing your inalienable rights or not. it is the judicial device with its guidelines and tactics that determine if your rights are included – or not.*right to trial by way of informed jury as protection in opposition to corrupt judicial techniques and bad laws:because of judiciary’s unique position of authority over the legal guidelines and its rules, the founding fathers believed it to be maximum prone to perverting the which means of right laws and forging awful processes underneath their own or others’ unique interests. To counter the one-of-a-kind manipulate of the judiciary by using the judicial elite, a trial with the aid of an knowledgeable jury became built into the invoice of Rights even where most effective a sizable amount of money changed into at stake in an ordeal.The jury changed into the public’s manner of collaborating within the judicial system as a safety in opposition to judicial perversions or the awful laws it tries to enforce. The jury is considered ‘knowledgeable’ because it had the right now not simplest to choose the fact or falsity of the evidence, however locate the defendant harmless regardless of the proof if they taken into consideration the regulation unjust or unfair.Thomas Jefferson considered that ensuring an informed jury for trials changed into the most effective way yet known to man to keep the concepts of the charter against horrific legal guidelines and a perverted judiciary. a few even taken into consideration the proper to an knowledgeable jury greater essential to maintaining our liberty than the proper to vote.*Incorporating the Maxims of regulation promotes reality, justice and fairness in courts:for the reason that it is inside the courtroom and its approaches where your rights are in jeopardy, it is critical that those strategies and judgments reflect and include those self-obtrusive truths that we all realize must observe. those are called Maxims of law.The process of the Maxims is to convey out the truth of the matter. it really is because with out fact you can’t have justice. And with out justice, you cannot have liberty. So where the Maxims are disregarded, the court is denying justice to a defendant or a litigant.*What feature do Maxims promote in court docket strategies?Maxims:- promote reality via requiring simplest sworn testimony against a defendant or litigant and require that perjury be punished while glaring.- do not concern litigants to legal guidelines which can be indistinct – now not clean to precisely what’s required or due. Wrongs ought to be sincerely wrong to affordable people – no longer made up whims of unique hobby agencies- Require clean and convincing evidence for wrongs finished – not accusations and preconceived sufferers and perpetrators- apprehend that litigants’ motives frequently determine the nature of their testimony- Imposes no punishment or responsibility in which no wrong is finished- matches responsibilities and the blessings that accompany them to the identical litigant- Assures the criminal strategies that benefit one person aren’t denied to any other person.it’s tough to consider that there are courts that ignore such self-obtrusive necessities to help sell fair judgments. however there are.*Does the rule of thumb of law you’re dwelling underneath mean liberty or tyranny?Courts are in which our rights are in jeopardy – wherein our unalienable rights are secured or no longer. Their position of very last authority on what’s prison – as opposed to what is right and simply – makes them dangerous to litigants and the standards of liberty.those who could tyrannize some whilst reaping benefits others, will accomplish that thru the judiciary and people court methods that exclude informed juries, forget about the Maxims of law, and put into effect legal excuses that profess to be a greater good than our unalienable rights.Now you could recognize if you’re tyrannized or receiving justice consistent with the ‘rule of regulation’ you’re concern to.